AMERICAN CHARITY OFFERS UK ADDICTS MONEY TO BE STERLIZED

This comes from the BBC NEWS LONDON. There is a video that goes along with this story but I haven't been able to figure out how to post it along with the article yet. So head on over to the original link and check out the video as well.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11545519

AMERICAN CHARITY OFFERS UK ADDICTS MONEY TO BE STERALISED


Project Prevention is offering to pay £200 to any drug user in London, Glasgow, Bristol, Leicester and parts of Wales who agrees to be operated on.

The first person in the UK to accept the cash is drug addict "John" from Leicester who says he "should never be a father".

The move has been criticised by some drug charities who work with addicts.

Project Prevention founder Barbara Harris admitted her methods amounted to "bribery", but said it was the only way to stop babies being physically and mentally damaged by drugs during pregnancy.

Drug treatment charity Addaction estimates one million children in the UK are living with parents who abuse drugs.

Pregnant addicts can pass on the dependency to the unborn child, leading to organ and brain damage.

Mrs Harris set up her charity in North Carolina after adopting the children of a crack addict.

Damage to children

Speaking to the BBC's Inside Out programme, she said: "The birth mother of my children obviously dabbled in all drugs and alcohol - she literally had a baby every year for eight years.

"I get very angry about the damage that drugs do to these children."

After paying 3,500 addicts across the United States not to have children, she is now visiting parts of the UK blighted by drugs to encourage users to undergo "long-term birth control" for cash.

John, a 38-year-old addict from Leicester, is the first person in the UK to accept money to have a vasectomy after being involved in drugs since he was 12.

He said: "It was something that I'd been thinking about for a long time.

"I won't be able to support a kid; I can just about manage to support myself."

Simon Antrobus, chief executive of Addaction, said while no-one wanted to see children brought up in a drug-using environment, there was no place for Project Prevention in the UK.

"It exploits very vulnerable people who are addicted to drugs and alcohol at probably the lowest point in their lives," he said.

The Reverend Robert Black, of Victory Outreach, which works with former addicts in east London, said he thought Project Prevention's aims were "very devious".

Reversible contraception

Maria Cripps, team leader at Islington's Dovetail service which is part of Cranstoun Drug Services, said: "I think Barbara uses some very extreme examples to get her point across. It might work in America but Great Britain is a very different country."

But Reverend Martin Blakebrough, director of Camden's Kaleidoscope Project in north London, said sterilisation was "worth considering" if it was right for the individual.

A spokesperson at the British Medical Association said: "The BMA's ethics committee does not have a view on the charity Project Prevention.

"As with all requests for treatment, doctors need to be confident that the individual has the capacity to make the specific decision at the time the decision is required.

"The BMA's ethics committee also believes that doctors should inform patients of the benefits of reversible contraception so that the patients have more reproductive choices in the future."

This is a very controversal topic. I would love to hear what you guys think. I have heard comments for the program and against the program and they both have good things to say.

The program won't steralize unless they are of a certain age, have had kids before and are in active addiction. They also say they have a doc that will reverse the steralization for free later on if someone gets clean and changes their mind. They offer other forms of birth control such as the IUD and the implants like norplant. They said they give a one time payment for steralization and a payment every six months for the long term methods after it is verified that it is still in place.
They validate this method by saying that these same women are using abortion as birth control so isn't it better to help prevent the pregnancies in the first place rather than using our tax dollars for thier abortions and/or care for these babies that are born with all these health probs and mental disabilities.

Some ppl say they are taking advantage of a drug addict when they are at thier weakest point so they aren't in their right mind to make such a decision. They think it's not fair because we they are tricking them into giving away their right to have babies when they would sell thier right arm for thier fix at that moment in thier lives.

Share with me what you think!